Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:47:03 +0100
From:      Paolo Tealdi <paolo.tealdi@polito.it>
To:        Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: dump level 9
Message-ID:  <7.0.1.0.0.20060316133119.020459c8@polito.it>
In-Reply-To: <44194A05.4010600@dial.pipex.com>
References:  <7.0.1.0.0.20060315131135.0327a978@polito.it> <441821AD.1080605@dial.pipex.com> <7.0.1.0.0.20060315153306.02165290@polito.it> <4418344D.8080003@dial.pipex.com> <7.0.1.0.0.20060316091138.01fa4ae8@polito.it> <44194A05.4010600@dial.pipex.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11.20 16/03/2006 +0000, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:

>Clutching at straws, here are some things I might try:
>
>1) "which dump" - just to be absolutely sure

/sbin/dump


>2) Remake dump from /usr/src.
>
>3) Make sure base system is OK.  Cvsup, buildworld, buildkernel etc.
>This would bring you up to -p12 and require reboot.  If behaviour 
>still the same, file a PR.
>
>4) Depending on your C prowess, instrument dump with some debugging 
>info - at the point where it decides to back up a file, print out 
>the relevant variables (the dates on the file and the date that it 
>is being compared against).  This will generate a lot of output but 
>you can just hit ^C after a few seconds of printing.  I don't think 
>gdb would be an option as dump forks to
>
>5) Do a level 0 of / home.  Check that the restore actually works by 
>actually restoring at least some of it, not just using ls.  Then 
>newfs /home  being very careful and then restore it! (Being 
>paranoid, I would make more than one dump, including one to tape, 
>and would restore one of the backups to some spare disk).

I will do a newfs on saturday afternoon, after doing some backups 
(also on tape). After this, if the problem  persists, i'll do the 
pass 2, 3 and 4.
In my opinion something gets damaged at filesystem level after an 
energy block (date are similar). I did an fsck (more times) but the 
problem persists : probably fsck doesn't recognise the problem.
It could be important to do debugging for this problem, but it's a 
production disk (big) and i can't "play" with it too much.
Thanks a lot for your support.

Best regards,
Paolo Tealdi


Ing. Paolo Tealdi              Servizi Informatici per le Biblioteche
Politecnico Torino             Phone : +39-011-5646714 , FAX : +39-011-5646799
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi,  24 - 10129 Torino - ITALY Email : 
paolo.tealdi@polito.it




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7.0.1.0.0.20060316133119.020459c8>