Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 02 Dec 1998 12:52:01 -0800
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
To:        Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>
Cc:        Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? 
Message-ID:  <8701.912631921@zippy.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Dec 1998 17:28:24 %2B0100." <19981202172824.A23747@klemm.gtn.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The offer -STABLE source and -CURRENT Snaps.
> Things they are working on is:
> 
> 	- IPv6 
> 	- IPsec 
> 	- advanced packet queuing, ATM, mobility,....

One has to ask the obvious question, however: The existing IPSec stuff
that's been submitted for commit approval is fully functional and
currently in use at several sites in Europe.  If we went to the KAME
stuff right now, today, would we be able to offer these users the same
degree of functionality or would KAME represent a "loss" from their
perspective?

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8701.912631921>