Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 15:44:10 +0900 From: Hidetoshi Shimokawa <simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: jesse@wingnet.net Cc: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd 5.2.1-RELEASE, 4 pin laptop firewire ports, and 6 pin firewire hard disk drives Message-ID: <874qrhzsxx.wl@tora.nunu.org> In-Reply-To: <c5or8p$c5a$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <c3i354$q38$1@sea.gmane.org> <87u10itsoo.wl@tora.nunu.org> <c3ph75$9ii$1@sea.gmane.org> <87r7vj2c0x.wl@tora.nunu.org> <c3r3g3$6n0$1@sea.gmane.org> <c5or8p$c5a$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:40:24 -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Apr 16 10:17:10 billmax /kernel: fwohci0: <VIA VT6306> port 0x8000-0x807f mem 0xe4101000-0xe41017ff irq 15 at device 10.0 on pci0 > Apr 16 10:17:10 billmax /kernel: fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) > Apr 16 10:17:10 billmax /kernel: fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channel is 8. > Apr 16 10:17:10 billmax /kernel: fwohci0: EUI64 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:03:4d EUI64 seems invalid. Do you get the same id on FreeBSD-5 and PowerBook? > I'm going to try this same card and drive on a 5.2.1 machine, > but I'm starting to think that something is wrong with FreeBSD's > firewire implementation. The drive always works fine on my boss's > Powerbook. It's not necessary because of firewire implementation. If the parent bus such as PCI/Cardbus is not initialized correctly, the firewire can not work correctly. The firewire codes in -stable and -current are very close. PCI and related codes are very different. /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa \/ simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp PGP public key: http://www.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~simokawa/pgp.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?874qrhzsxx.wl>