Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:11:46 +0200 From: Chris Knipe <savage@savage.za.org> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: FreeBSD - <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Mailing List Etiquette was freebsd vs. netbsd Message-ID: <CA%2B4TWFtgaMkJWAOuvEpSg2TOo2hrG-P7EHJUigCQwgQw3iXtWQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200616140416.bd7b8bf2.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20200613154409.GA89618@neutralgood.org> <13115.1592302784@segfault.tristatelogic.com> <20200616071153.00006f4d@seibercom.net> <CA%2B4TWFuWN1BV=FftC1xNCYRgqwX%2BCb=wMg_L9MxFHx17Nzjm5Q@mail.gmail.com> <20200616075548.000066f1@seibercom.net> <20200616140416.bd7b8bf2.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > While this is true in general, one should always keep in > mind not to confuse change with improvement: "newer" does > not magically imply "better", so educated human judgement > is always welcome. > That is your opinion, and you're entitled to it. Frankly, I am -very- happy we have moved past 76 character width limitations, and text based emails with crappy fonts. Yes, there is risk involved, sure. There are risks involved in -anything- you do online these days... Again, there's means to protect against it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2B4TWFtgaMkJWAOuvEpSg2TOo2hrG-P7EHJUigCQwgQw3iXtWQ>