Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:55:51 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, blackfriar <blackfriar@inhio.eu> Subject: Re: NFS within a Jail?! Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK2sFU%2BjMf6f7Yir7o9JjKUK=u-p1syFONds0MV=M7nZqg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5022715C.9010301@a1poweruser.com> References: <1344347348.23440.5.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> <5022715C.9010301@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> wrote: > > Long answer is; NFS requires rpcbind to function. rpcbind is dependent on > a network stack. Jails do not have their own network stack, they use the > hosts network stack. Dealing with this has been SOP practice in jails since their inception. See man 8 jail. The best way to run the NFS server is from the jail. Running it host side is the hard part. > There is some experimental software to give each jail its own network > stack but I sure would not deploy a production system based on this. > There are a number of people who have reached the opposite decision concerning VIMAGE/VNET enabled jails. They are much easier to work with and provide nice capabilities. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK2sFU%2BjMf6f7Yir7o9JjKUK=u-p1syFONds0MV=M7nZqg>