Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Jun 2015 11:20:38 -0700
From:      Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Realtime process CPU starvation
Message-ID:  <CAA3ZYrDXmMXk1ZuP0oGd_6G%2BvKTXtfA6mPAsx_spgojHMnE81Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
For those who care, I'm running
kern.sched.name: ULE

My (feeble) understanding is that the scheduler mostly looks at cpu
time, and processes doing i/o actually get a bump *up* in priority,
since because of the way hardware worked in the late 1970s-early 1980s
(PDP-11, VAX, ...) the i/o got useful work done while using very little
cpu time.  As a result, jobs that do a lot of i/o can receive more
than their fair share of cpu time.  And nice(1) (even rtprio and idprio)
may not have much effect on jobs that are i/o bound.  Some form of
ionice is sorely needed.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAA3ZYrDXmMXk1ZuP0oGd_6G%2BvKTXtfA6mPAsx_spgojHMnE81Q>