Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:13:26 +0100 From: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it> To: iijima yoshino <iijimayoshino@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD doesn't have a Gnome3 port? Message-ID: <CAKoxK%2B6=CdtntMJ-MRe9AqmmRcHM3EN_5HqUOYHEA1NvFRmcjw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1386253808.8359.5.camel@debian> References: <1386221592.4385.16.camel@debian> <CAKoxK%2B61HZPLR_xM7BC12dHc3y4eHPDCEvsRC8oQ_Jm1wUovnQ@mail.gmail.com> <1386253808.8359.5.camel@debian>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:30 PM, iijima yoshino <iijimayoshino@gmail.com> wrote: > Even the OpenBSD team accepts the Gnome3 ... > It seems the FreeBSD towards to a server-oriented way. > Why server oriented, just because gnome3 is not supported? Gnome3 is only _a_ desktop among the others. So who is making FreeBSD more "towards a server", FreeBSD itself or Gnome 3 that refuses to adopt other non-linux facilities? If other unixes have gnome3 it simply means they have manpower and interest to port it. Not being a gnome3 user (actually, a gnome user at all), I don't care about porting a desktop that is not interested in being portable. Luca
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKoxK%2B6=CdtntMJ-MRe9AqmmRcHM3EN_5HqUOYHEA1NvFRmcjw>