Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Feb 2020 03:49:49 +0300
From:      Yuri Pankov <yuripv@yuripv.me>
To:        Tomasz CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info>
Cc:        Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD 12.0 end-of-life
Message-ID:  <D2835D98-3303-4DE7-A98D-82035535E18B@yuripv.me>
In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXjk=rpp_8nD=xGirghCLouRAsC-N%2BJJppMKDQN0aGKnKDw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20200217231452.717FA1E820@freefall.freebsd.org> <CAFYkXjmZi1-MB6W0HsMx9gHek7Xg5heoSKKWkNTnw74dxRTwAw@mail.gmail.com> <20200218091959.b0220ac75bcfbbced91a5708@sohara.org> <CAFYkXjmWBUDyV3XKL1qwt=g0AUgDttDfOB6euKqJMAmOs-1Prw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyFy2D4Dyq6P6sZZ70R1cG%2BNoVcv808sbQeSWTzTrNELnH8ew@mail.gmail.com> <CAFYkXjk=rpp_8nD=xGirghCLouRAsC-N%2BJJppMKDQN0aGKnKDw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 Feb 2020, at 20:39, Tomasz CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> wrote:
>=20
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 3:51 PM Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>=20
>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 05:37, Tomasz CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Maybe its a time to give OpenBSD a try..
>>=20
>> I really don't understand this comment, either. Certainly give =
OpenBSD
>> a try and if it fits your needs better that's great.
>>=20
>> As far as I'm aware OpenBSD issues a release every six months and
>> supports the most recent two releases, so it seems odd to me to
>> complain about FreeBSD's ~1 year minor release support lifetime and 5
>> year stable branch support lifetime in that context.
>=20
> Its more like "lets try if what I need works better over there". Not
> really the release timeline.
>=20
> The release timeline problem is more related with pushing untested
> features (and possible avalanche of solutions that introduce yet
> another complications that we observe right now).
>=20
> "The BSD Way", for me, was always about "it works solid or its not
> there". Like macOS / iOS.
>=20
> Unlike "The Linux Way" where things changes upside down from release
> to release and each one of them has its own universe of variants. Like
> Android.
>=20
> I am not sure if it is that important if there is a release in 6 month
> or 2 years. Not a problem at all. If in two years I get a 5 new
> features that work rock solid then it seems a better choice than
> getting new features every six months and have more problems on a
> production because of that.
>=20
> If I need to experiment there is a CURRENT branch. For well tested
> features I have STABLE. For rock solid "I bet my money on that" I have
> a RELEASE. Right?
>=20
> I did miss the 12.0 EoL kind of fix for DRM, sorry, it seems
> reasonable. I am just worried that 12.2-RELEASE will have the same
> problems, if not more new problems.

It is something you can help with, run 12.2-STABLE on some spare =
equipment and report problems that affect *your* environment.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D2835D98-3303-4DE7-A98D-82035535E18B>