Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:12:57 +0000
From:      John Bolton <John.Bolton@software.dell.com>
To:        olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>
Cc:        "apache@FreeBSD.org" <apache@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   RE: FreeBSD Port: devel/apr1
Message-ID:  <EA8A1926032B8F439F5F06D5817815B124CDA4FF@ALVMBXW01.prod.quest.corp>
In-Reply-To: <52530EB1.4010301@gmx.de>
References:  <EA8A1926032B8F439F5F06D5817815B124CDA3D8@ALVMBXW01.prod.quest.corp> <52530EB1.4010301@gmx.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you Olli.=20

I was able to get this to work:

make -D BATCH WITH=3D"LDAP" package

Putting a -D before WITH or WITHOUT does not work but perhaps that was a ty=
po on your part. ;)

John

-----Original Message-----
From: olli hauer [mailto:ohauer@gmx.de]=20
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 12:43 PM
To: apache@FreeBSD.org
Cc: John Bolton
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/apr1

On 2013-10-07 20:05, John Bolton wrote:
> Hi guys,
>=20
> I ran into some trouble building this port on FreeBSD 9.1 x64 using the -=
D arguments so the build does not require user interaction. The command lin=
e I used is:
>=20
> make -D BATCH -D WITH_LDAP package
>=20
> Unfortunately, the build proceeds without LDAP support. I noticed the Mak=
efule does not contain an OPTIONS_DEFINE line. The build worked as expected=
 after modifying the Makefile to include this line. The version of apr1 I a=
m building is 1.4.8.
>=20
> What do you guys thinks about this?
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> John Bolton

Hello John,

I'm not sure if the new OPTIONS framework covers all cases, but the new not=
ation is working as expected https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/Options=
NG

> make -D BATCH -D WITH=3DLDAP package

also with disabling a default option

> make -D BATCH -D WITH=3D"LDAP PGSQL" WITHOUT=3D"GDBM" package


--
Regards,
olli



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EA8A1926032B8F439F5F06D5817815B124CDA4FF>