Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Sep 2000 02:36:22 +1100 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
Cc:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_idle.c src/sys/vm vm_meter.c src/sys/i386/isa ithread.c src/sys/sys proc.h 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009170219320.4666-100000@besplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <98695.969066547@winston.osd.bsdi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote:

> >   - Add a new process flag P_NOLOAD that marks a process that should be
> >     ignored during load average calcuations.
> >   - Set this flag for the idle processes and the softinterrupt process.

It shouldn't be set for the softinterrupt process since that process does
useful work.

> Yet another reason why the concept of a "load average" simply bites to
> an increasing degree with any halfway rational OS, something Unix
> hasn't always been exactly on the money with.

You have this backwards.  It bites to a decreasing degree now that
interrupt processes are accounted for in the same way as user processes.
(I don't think they should be.  It costs a fairly heavyweight context
switch including microtime() for each interrupt.)

Bruce



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009170219320.4666-100000>