Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 01:34:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, intron@intron.ac Subject: Re: [emulation] ports/95158: The port linux_base-fc3 misses two fundamental packages Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604020133090.11965@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <20060402004306.69646824@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <200604010014.k310EfbR089078@freefall.freebsd.org> <25452314@bs2.sp34.ru> <20060402004306.69646824@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > libselinux on the other side is a little bit different. I haven't > looked at the contents of this package, but it sounds like it's related > to "security enhanced linux". Yes, that's what it is. > AFAIK this needs kernel support, which we don't have. But this is just a > wild guess at midnight, it may be wrong... I believe you are right. The one thing I do not know is whether applications linked against libselinux, or libselinux itself, will fail graciously in case kernel support is missing. If this is the case, it might make sense to include it even if, obviously, we do not have the kernel support. Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.61.0604020133090.11965>