Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:53:58 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Sprickman <spork@fasttrackmonkey.com> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> Cc: Kevin Lyons <klyons@corserv.com> Subject: Re: tcsh fix Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.61.0411121652530.2370@oof.local> In-Reply-To: <20041112213429.GD830@empiric.icir.org> References: <41940880.7070409@corserv.com> <20041112023023.GG19417@silverwraith.com> <20041112055543.GH19417@silverwraith.com> <41951400.8040805@corserv.com> <20041112213429.GD830@empiric.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > I'm extremely happy with having tcsh instead of csh in the base system. As > others have said, if someone has an operational requirement for plain old > csh, they are free to install the port and make the appropriate links. As an interested (and innocent) bystander, I'm not quite grasping why it's an either/or proposition. Why not just break the link, grab net/open's /bin/csh and commit it? Charles > BMS > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSX.4.61.0411121652530.2370>