Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:44:12 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: admin@lissyara.su, dougb@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: May be include in GENERIC option INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001050842340.75653@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20100104.150257.746477001028363176.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <4B23F10F.1010608@lissyara.su> <4B23FBA1.4070002@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912122342110.61723@fledge.watson.org> <20100104.150257.746477001028363176.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, M. Warner Losh wrote: > I'm planning on including standard files so that we can easily add things in > one place instead of many that will be better than DEFAULTS in the next > month or so. I've worked through several prototypes, none of which have > been suitable to share with the wider world, but each one better than the > one before... I'll post to arch@ when I have a proposal. Right, at this point what I'd really like to see is a sys/conf/GENERIC, GENERIC.std or the like that we can add generic things to in an MI fashion, which each architecture-specific GENERIC can explicitly include. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1001050842340.75653>