Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Jul 2007 20:36:23 +0800
From:      "Jiawei Ye" <leafy7382@gmail.com>
To:        "Kostik Belousov" <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: destroy_dev_sched() KPI in the tree
Message-ID:  <c21e92e20707070536x6c8053c0l7ecad5a5bfa6de15@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070705144443.GV2200@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References:  <20070703180141.GJ2200@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <E1I6SAN-0000by-Bt@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <20070705144443.GV2200@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/5/07, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Today, I reverted the part of commit that tried to transform destroy_dev()
> from d_close() into destroy_dev_sched(). See kern_conf.c, rev. 1.208.
> You shall call destroy_dev_sched() explicitely.
>
>
Does this mean that mount_smbfs has to explicitly call it now? It is
currently stuck in the devdrn state with the latest kernel :(

Jiawei Ye

-- 
"If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck,
then to the end user it's a duck, and end users have made it pretty
clear they want a duck; whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or
coffee is irrelevant."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c21e92e20707070536x6c8053c0l7ecad5a5bfa6de15>