Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 11:22:17 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to make Apache (2.2.4) less greedy, or Sendmail less polite? Message-ID: <f1eu0a$3h5$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <2BEB30C2-C9C5-43AB-9DCA-5C9A1B0AC2C0@axis.nl> References: <2BEB30C2-C9C5-43AB-9DCA-5C9A1B0AC2C0@axis.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig63A834C889DFD8D82180BE50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Olaf Greve wrote: > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CP= U=20 > COMMAND > 91459 www 124 0 141M 15136K RUN 0:02 5.52% 5.52= %=20 > httpd > 91352 www 119 0 139M 12596K select 0:14 3.61% 3.61= %=20 > httpd The size of apache processes is telling me you're using PHP or some=20 other heavy apache module. If so, you can switch to using PHP as FastCGI = responder via mod_fcgid. The benefits are that you'll get only a few=20 number of large php-cgi processes (configurable, usually around 10), and = the rest will be lighter httpd processes for serving static content. BUT, if something else changed when you switched to the new apache (e.g. = PHP version, your web applications), it may not be apache's fault. --------------enig63A834C889DFD8D82180BE50 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGOvtJldnAQVacBcgRAscYAKCrESwa3PJrOL3yA4gyOGQXd+bNNACeI2Oz AHC4Jk/QTkQ3M6br2Izvt/A= =7YQP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig63A834C889DFD8D82180BE50--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f1eu0a$3h5$1>