Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 04:45:21 +0200 From: beeessdee@ruggedinbox.com To: "Glen Barber" <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Release Engineering Team <re@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1-BETA3 Now Available Message-ID: <fe17030e3efeefb5dfa800b46ee181d9.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion> In-Reply-To: <20140928155118.GA75063@hub.FreeBSD.org> References: <20140928155118.GA75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:51:18 -0400, "Glen Barber" <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 Why 10.1-BETA3 announcement signed with not usual PGP key? gpgv: Signature made Sun Sep 28 11:51:18 2014 EDT using RSA key ID 478FE293 gpgv: Can't check signature: No public key Compare 10.1-BETA2 announce: gpgv: Signature made Sun Sep 21 13:06:56 2014 EDT using RSA key ID AF8B5ED0 gpgv: using subkey AF8B5ED0 instead of primary key A0B946A3 gpgv: Good signature from "Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>" gpgv: aka "Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com>" gpgv: aka "Glen Barber <gjb@glenbarber.us>" gpgv: textmode signature, digest algorithm SHA256 This key new last year/expire 2018, so very unexpected. Shocking it is: some people actually check this, not like http://xkcd.com/1181/ , you know. ;-) Seriously, SHA256 checksum on ftp mirror not so useful. PGP signed mail with checksum, who could guess, we actually use this and its not wasted efforts! Thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fe17030e3efeefb5dfa800b46ee181d9.squirrel>