Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 16:39:41 -0500 From: Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com> To: bf1783@gmail.com Cc: alc@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent sys/vm/ changes and nvidia-driver Message-ID: <q2i179b97fb1005081439k8fd97c85y9e53c8db3aea9e3c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil0Gs3shexWm28gceSFpvIeJKfMAYEk9_t4jmzH@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTil0Gs3shexWm28gceSFpvIeJKfMAYEk9_t4jmzH@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 4:20 PM, b. f. <bf1783@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote: >> Doug Barton wrote: >>> On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote: >>> >>>> I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. =A0This round of >>>> changes >>>> are not yet complete. > > What performance differences, if any, can we expect on uniprocessors > from the vm page lock-related changes? Kip's original post on -arch > mentioned some performance improvements and no significant > regressions, but on a dual 4-core machine. Alan (or Kip): Is there a document available that describes the work being done on the VM system? I would like to -- or like make and attempt to -- read such a document... Hey b. f., to which post on -arch are you referring? -Brandon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?q2i179b97fb1005081439k8fd97c85y9e53c8db3aea9e3c>