Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 12:27:30 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request For Review: libc/libc_r changes to allow -lc_r Message-ID: <200101211927.f0LJRU901079@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:26:26 EST." <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010120171614.8403A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010120171614.8403A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010120171614.8403A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Daniel Eischen writes: : > By the way, should it be __thread_sys_foo and __foo? Two underscores? : > ISTR some rule about using a single leading underscore for file scope : > (e.g. macros) and two for global scope. : : I don't recall that, but anything for file scope that isn't a macro : can be static and not use the underscores. Macros are usually upper : case anyways. ANSI C reserves _[A-Z]* and __[a-zA-Z] to the implementation space. That leaves _[a-z] to the user name space, so Jacques is right about that. I can quote chapter and verse if you really want me to. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101211927.f0LJRU901079>