Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 5 May 2002 19:27:01 +1200
From:      James Pole <kiwisurfer1986@yahoo.co.nz>
To:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: BIND in -stable
Message-ID:  <200205051925.18247.kiwisurfer1986@yahoo.co.nz>
In-Reply-To: <20020505153435Y.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20020505151058Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20020504231746.H1525-100000@master.gorean.org> <20020505153435Y.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 05 May 2002 06:34, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
> DougB> Your post essentially repeats the same argument I've already
> DougB> made.  I'm not suggesting that we upgrade bind in any of the
> DougB> releng_4_* branches.  What I am suggesting is that users who
> DougB> have not updgraded to a version of freebsd that has 8.3.1 built
> DougB> in should use 8.3.1 from the ports.
>
> Hmm, maybe I misunderstand your point, sorry.  But as said in previous
> email, 8.3.1's nsupdate(8) is broken and I don't like to use BIND
> 8.3.1 even if ISC strongly suggests.

I think we should just stay with the current version if 8.3.1 has some br=
oken=20
tools. We should only consider upgrading if the new version works and the=
re=20
are obivious security advantages of upgrading, since we don't want to bre=
ak=20
anything.

- James



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205051925.18247.kiwisurfer1986>