Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 22:02:12 -0400 From: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@halplant.com> To: Razor Users <Razor-Users@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: FreeBSD ports <FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Release candidate: razor-agents 2.61 Message-ID: <20040704020212.GE83086@hal9000.halplant.com> In-Reply-To: <9819B556AF2FAC49B96DCFF2BC8B80F9AED8CE@exch2.corp.cloudmark.com> References: <9819B556AF2FAC49B96DCFF2BC8B80F9AED8CE@exch2.corp.cloudmark.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vipul, > If some of you would try it out and confirm it works, I'll > do a real release. While I can't compare the relative efficiency with 2.40, razor-check correctly identified all the recent spam I tested (which is not a fair efficiency test since it's all old) and submission appears to be working fine. The new engine appears to be picked up and working: Jul 03 21:49:53.791125 check[32078]: [ 8] Computed supported_engines: 4 8 This is running on FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE with Perl 5.8.4 from ports, with a trivially modified mail/razor-agents port[1]. The port presumes you have razor-agents-2.61-beta.tar.gz (nb. no -beta) in distfiles. [1] http://halplant.com:88/software/FreeBSD/ports/razor-agents-2.61.tar http://halplant.com:88/software/FreeBSD/ports/razor-agents-2.61.diff http://halplant.com:88/software/FreeBSD/packages/razor-agents-2.61.tgz -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@halplant.com | | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary | | safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040704020212.GE83086>