Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:34:54 +0200 (CEST) From: xskoba1@kremilek.gyrec.cz To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: question about routing, firewall, natd and bridge Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308181326060.24499-100000@kremilek.gyrec.cz>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hallo there, I had to change the provider. And after that my public IP adress are routed straight through FreeBSD Box. What is it best way to do it? I personally done it the way, where exist the localnet alias for every interface... eg.. ifconfig_ed0="inet 62.168.40.188 netmask 255.255.255.252 broadcast 62.168.40.191" after that there is local interface 192.168.1.1/255 and it's alias 172.16.0.1/255 and then route add -host 62.168.40.190 172.16.0.251 #it is an public and local ip adress of that host... but /var/log/kern.log is still clamining a warning arplookup 62.168.40.190 failed: host is no on local network... is it the correct way to do a route (especiall if I want to have a firewall with ipfw,natd and bridge or not?) your sincerely Karel Rous
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0308181326060.24499-100000>