Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:44:12 +1000 From: Stephen McKay <smckay@internode.on.net> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: Stephen McKay <smckay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost" Message-ID: <200407250144.i6P1iCPx005756@dungeon.home> In-Reply-To: <tjk5g09beet8bl73iimtgg3krflcj1rq3r@4ax.com> from Mike Tancsa at "Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:29:21 -0400" References: <200407240247.i6O2lQfJ007370@dungeon.home> <tjk5g09beet8bl73iimtgg3krflcj1rq3r@4ax.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, 24th July 2004, Mike Tancsa wrote: >On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:47:26 +1000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you >wrote: > >>I found Mike Tancsa's patch but didn't like it. I rolled my own, which >>seems to be working so far. It works by switching from LQR to simple >>echo requests when LQR times out. > >I feel so unliked ;-) :-) >Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to >get things working again for me. Most of the DSL aggregators here >are Juniper ERXes which do not play nice with FreeBSD's PPPoE. I think I would have just taken your hack if it had been in lqr_Setup() where hdlc.lqm.method is initially set. As it was I was in a funny mood and wanted to write my own hack. :-) >>(This is a patch against ppp in FreeBSD 4.8. I haven't tried the ppp in >>-current yet as -current is still a wild and woolly place that scares me.) > >I think Brian re worked the LQR portion at least from looking at the >commit messages If I'm looking at the same stuff as you, he's reworked the LQR code to be more accurate with byte counts and such. I don't see any changes that address our "LQR fails completely" problems. Stephen.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407250144.i6P1iCPx005756>