Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:39:53 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: "Denise H. G." <darcsis@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should Gnome2 meta port include security/pinentry-gtk2? Message-ID: <1232246393.51752.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <864ozyskxn.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name> References: <86vdsghdum.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name> <1232157465.1547.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <864ozyskxn.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-E/Rn4H1J/iz62LmkVAbM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 10:52 +0800, Denise H. G. wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> writes: >=20 > > On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 21:56 +0800, Denise H. G. wrote: > >> It seems that without security/pinentry-gtk2, seahorse wouldn't get fu= ll > >> functions, such as adding new names to an existing key. > > > > Is this documented anywhere? > > > > Joe > > >=20 > I haven't found it on seahorse's official site. But I got this on > redhat's bug archives and gentoo's: >=20 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D474419 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D159505 Interesting because I don't see anywhere in the seahorse code where pinentry is executed. In fact, seahorse is working just fine for me without pinentry. Can you provide a sequence I can test which will illustrate the problem caused by lacking pinentry-gtk2? Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-E/Rn4H1J/iz62LmkVAbM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAklylngACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4c5MACfZ+YVM7jL7q5N6x6xAaus1cPb 9e8AmgLOaYcJ+ollkhQzkW/INjxM3P5r =oqqs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-E/Rn4H1J/iz62LmkVAbM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1232246393.51752.6.camel>