Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 20:21:24 -0400 From: Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> To: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: dtrace@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Fixes from illumos Message-ID: <20130728002124.GB11294@charmander.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <51F2BC34.1040405@FreeBSD.org> References: <51F2BC34.1040405@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:13:08PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; > > I am trying to put together the last two patches that we need to be > (mostly) up to date with illumos. > > This "svn diff" patch brings back the rest of a somewhat elusive > revision 249367 that gave us trouble before and had to be > reverted: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/patches/dtrace/libdtrace-r249367.diff > > It should take care of the following issues: > > 3022 DTrace: keys should not affect the sort order when sorting by value > 3023 it should be possible to dereference dynamic variables > 3024 D integer narrowing needs some work > > Ignore the attempts to get repo copies of the tests when applying the > patch but do report any regression or secondary issue it may cause. I've applied the patch on my machine. I don't see any regressions in the test suite and my basic sanity testing is going fine. > > After this, I would like to re-apply r249429, which should cover most > of the remaining changes from Illumos. Still pending for review are > some changes for Solaris zones support that very probably don't > apply to our codebase at all. Did you mistype that? r249429 has nothing to do with DTrace. -Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130728002124.GB11294>