Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:18:36 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: security/hydra and www/hydra Message-ID: <86hbjsiimb.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86pqygiiuf.fsf@gmail.com> (Anonymous's message of "Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:13:44 %2B0400") References: <390621279717692@web26.yandex.ru> <86r5iwkciz.fsf@chateau.d.if> <4C472AB1.9070209@yandex.ru> <20100721202111.GE4468@home.opsec.eu> <20100721220509.GB23159@lonesome.com> <86pqygiiuf.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> writes: > Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> writes: > >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>> > And is this ok to have two ports with the same name. >>> >>> No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some >>> portupgrade tool will break. >> >> No, they actually handle it ok. It _is_ confusing to the users, however >> (and, if you go through a raw list of package binaries, You Just Have To >> Know which one's which.) > > So, which package the following command will install? > > $ pkg_add -r hydra Ah, it uses NO_LATEST_LINK. So the answer is `none'. Sorry.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hbjsiimb.fsf>