Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:47:23 -0600 From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: jails: am I missing something or.. Message-ID: <520BEB45-E58E-11D8-A557-003065A70D30@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <55702.81.84.175.12.1090758569.squirrel@81.84.175.12> References: <55702.81.84.175.12.1090758569.squirrel@81.84.175.12>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 25, 2004, at 6:29 AM, Hugo Silva wrote: > It is unthinkable to be umount'ing EVERY jail if I want to add one. > I need separate filesystems for jails if I want (I *need* to) user > quotas > on jails > If I have separate filesystems, I can't create a new jail while the > disk > is being used (ie other jails mount'ed). > > Living with 1 ip? I could do it. Now, this is a major drawback. > > I've been a FreeBSD user for a long time, so I'm hoping there is a > solution to this matter-- (bottom line: working user quotas INSIDE > jails: > need either a way to have them w/ different partitions and be able to > create new jails with all other jails running, or need a way to use > quotas > with only a big partition) I find it weird there exists this big > limitation on the jail system. > try using the mdX memory/file backed file systems for your jails... Works well (though I have not tried the user quota -- you do get separate filesystems) Chad
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?520BEB45-E58E-11D8-A557-003065A70D30>