Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:00:11 -0500 From: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de>, freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Small update for the list of supported systems Message-ID: <20021211220011.D84047@locore.ca> In-Reply-To: <200212111646.gBBGkQhM041405@intruder.bmah.org>; from bmah@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:46:26AM -0800 References: <20021211071133.GG1467@nathan.ruhr.de> <200212111646.gBBGkQhM041405@intruder.bmah.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Apparently, On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:46:26AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah said words to the effect of; > If memory serves me right, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > > > I have attached a small patch to the release notes for sparc64 that > > list Netra t1120/1125 and Enterprise 4500 servers as supported > > systems; it also changes the status of isp(4) cards from 'should > > work soon' to 'working'. > > > > All changes are based on my personal experience (I only used an > > sbus isp(4) card and did not try the PCI variant, so there is > > some room for error). > > > > Unless there are objection, I'll run this by re@ for inclusion in > > the releates notes. > > On a related note: I'd still like to see the hardware notes for sparc64 > start to use the generic file (common/dev.sgml) rather than a file > created especially for sparc64 (sparc64/dev-sparc64.sgml), if that's > feasible. Ultimately this will make maintenence of the hardware notes a > lot easier, but it's not clear to me how well it'll work at this point > in time. If I understand correctly everything in there is annotated to indicate what arch its supported on, so I think this would work fine. Some sparc64 only stuff would need to be added (hme, gem, sab), but that's all that I noticed in a quick perusal. Do either of you want to do this? Quick question: is it possible to include a file from the doc tree in the sparc.sgml platform webpage? I'd like to have a brief list of systems that are supported there, with a more detailed list in proc-sparc64.sgml, but would like to avoid listing them twice. Jake > > (Note, however, that sparc64/dev-sparc64.sgml has exactly one revision, > committed almost a year ago. I'm pretty sure it needs some updating.) > > Cheers, > > Bruce. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021211220011.D84047>