Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:04:23 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org, Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@highsecure.ru> Subject: Re: ports/82235: New port: mail/mutt-ng Message-ID: <42B00B37.7060804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20050615104110.GA56428@heechee.tobez.org> References: <200506150810.j5F8AEPA013710@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050615090623.GA27207@alaska.cert.siemens.com> <20050615104110.GA56428@heechee.tobez.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anton Berezin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:06:23AM +0200, Udo Schweigert wrote: > > >>As the maintainer of the mutt ports I vote against it. > > > I don't think it is a reasonable position. There will undoubtedly be a > number of people willing to give it a try, and the rest is just politics > better to be avoided in the ports tree. Agree. If it's an official fork, why we can't have the separate port? -- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42B00B37.7060804>