Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 May 1999 22:50:17 -0500 (EST)
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>
To:        Jeff Fulton <jefff@nsw.bigpond.net.au>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvsup question
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.990511224904.26546B-100000@cygnus.rush.net>
In-Reply-To: <000601be9c18$3b12f980$d9c809c0@ljefff>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Jeff Fulton wrote:

> I've been running 3.1-release for a while (without problems), but decided
> it would be a good idea to starting tracking -STABLE.
> 
> Having only one system, I was trying to be cautious, so I csvup'd into
> /cvsup/stable/usr/src rather than stratight into /usr/src.  The idea was
> that if I mucked things up, I could go back to the /usr/src tree.
> 
> I cvsup'd, did a "make world" which worked fine, and then rebuilt &
> installed the kernel (from the ususal spot in /usr/src).
> 
> Now I get the following error from devstat/iostat:
> 
> crypto# iostat
> iostat: checkversion: userland devstat version 3 is not the same as the
> kernel
> checkversion: devstat version 2
> checkversion: you really should know better than to upgrade your
> checkversion: userland binaries without upgrading your kernel
> crypto#
> 
> Am I right in assuming that this is because I built the kernel in the old
> /usr/src tree rather than the cvsup'd tree?  Can/should I just rebuild the
> kernel in the cvsup tree, or is my idea of two separate trees flawed?

*reaching for paddle*

*nod*, don't do that.  It's VERY important that you keep your
kernel and userland "in sync", you should recompile from your
cvsup'd sources.

-Alfred



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990511224904.26546B-100000>