Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:44:44 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        Kirk McKusick <mckusick@flamingo.McKusick.COM>
Cc:        fs@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: changing mount options still can cause damage?
Message-ID:  <20000221174444.W21720@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <200002220000.QAA18690@flamingo.McKusick.COM>; from mckusick@flamingo.McKusick.COM on Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 04:00:51PM -0800
References:  <20000220031938.D21720@fw.wintelcom.net> <200002220000.QAA18690@flamingo.McKusick.COM>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Kirk McKusick <mckusick@flamingo.McKusick.COM> [000221 16:30] wrote:
> 	Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 03:19:38 -0800
> 	From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
> 	To: fs@freebsd.org
> 	Cc: mckusick@freebsd.org
> 	Subject: changing mount options still can cause damage?
> 
> 	Is it true that we can still cause major damage to filesystems that
> 	are moved from read-only to read-write or noasync <-> async?
> 
> 	>From the mount manpage:
> 
> 	--
> 	BUGS
> 	 It is possible for a corrupted file system to cause a crash.
> 
> 	 Switching a filesystem back and forth between asynchronous and
> 	 normal operation or between read/write and read/only access
> 	 using ``mount -u'' may gradually bring about severe filesystem
> 	 corruption.
> 	--
> 
> 	The first bug is understandable, but personally I've never seen the
> 	second happen, is this still a real problem?
> 
> 	If not I'd like to remove it.
> 
> 	thanks,
> 	-- 
> 	-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
> 
> Switching between read-only and read-write should never cause filesystem
> corruption. Running async can certainly lead to corruption if the
> system crashes. There is an indeterminate period of time after the
> system has been switched from async to sync before it will be stable
> again, but that period will rarely be more than a minute or two. The
> act of switching between sync and async should not cause corruption.
> It is just the inherent risk of corruption while running async.
> 
> 	Kirk McKusick

Then I vote to remove it, there's no reason we should be slandering
ourselves in our own manpages, the async option already describes
the dangers pretty clearly.

May I axe it?

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000221174444.W21720>