Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:12:06 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Any idea why timespec* is _KERNEL stuff only? Message-ID: <20040721121206.GA746@frontfree.net> In-Reply-To: <82157.1090409805@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20040721113211.GA1899@frontfree.net> <82157.1090409805@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:36:45PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >Hi, Poul-Henning, > > > >It seems that rev. 1.23 of sys/sys/time.h has constrained timespec* macr= os > >to be _KERNEL (KERNEL in the old days) only. Is this intended? (NetBSD a= nd > >OpenBSD don't expect _KERNEL for these macros, e.g. timespeccmp, and I > >personally think that these macros will be better for more generic use, > >as timespec structure is not _KERNEL protected :-) >=20 > I agree. I belive I made the _KERNEL only due to pressure from the > standards people or possibly bde@, can't remember to be honest. Oh... Shall I ask for a review for a change of the current behavior, or hav= e my own version of timespec* macros in my program, for compability reasons? Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij frontfree net> http://www.delphij.net/ See complete headers for GPG key and other information. --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA/l2WOfuToMruuMARAuIjAJ9EHxmhdQwR0cH78mv65XAD/j+wDQCdEj2G Z+OWreaNxhPYi8rQO/81Tgo= =tme3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040721121206.GA746>