Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 10:07:40 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> Cc: wade@ezri.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 7000 ports! Message-ID: <20020526100740.A33058@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020526.102257.128613796.imp@village.org>; from imp@village.org on Sun, May 26, 2002 at 10:22:57AM -0600 References: <20020525135436.A59827@xor.obsecurity.org> <3CF07E81.6040508@ezri.org> <20020526090500.A32725@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20020526.102257.128613796.imp@village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 10:22:57AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20020526090500.A32725@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> > Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes: > : So, your 96% is somewhat optimistic for very current > : FreeBSD-current. > > -current is massively F*'d right now wrt to perl, C++ and other common > things :-(. People are working on the problems. So judging ports > based on -current this month is likely to be massively unfair to > ports. > Yes, I know. I forgot to add :-) or maybe it should be :-( to my email. On the bright side, I have found the problem with linking Fortran programs (any port that requires Fortran is also broken). I have sent David email with a quick hack and a suggested longer term fix. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020526100740.A33058>