Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:01:50 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Nedotsukov <bland@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about our default pthread stack size Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0411191053500.15618-100000@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <419DA6CC.7040002@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: > Hey guys, > > After squashing yet another "too small thread stack size" bug in > software developed on Linux. I decided to ask gurus for the comment. Why > we still insist that 64K is good enough for 32bit archs? I do understand I suggested we double the stack size for 64-bit archs (making it 128K). I could see going to 256K for 32-bit and 512K for 64-bit. We haven't worried too much about stack size since everything has been running with libc_r for years without too many problems and it's been using the same stack size. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.43.0411191053500.15618-100000>