Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 14:57:26 +0000 (UTC) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USE_AUTOEXTRACT option for bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <b4d0cm$13n8$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> References: <200303060431.h264VAjO082569@green.bikeshed.org> <20030306192318.GB435@rot13.obsecurity.org> <b4bkml$1f3g$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <20030308124342.26541aa7.corecode@corecode.ath.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode@corecode.ath.cx> wrote:
> how about an implicity AUTOEXTRACT
I suspect that this will break some ports right now. I think we
want to get there eventually, but it's a policy question (read:
portmgr decision) how to perform the switchover.
> that can be disabled by USE_ZIP, USE_BZIP2 and NO_AUTOEXTRACT?
Actually, if we keep them around to set EXTRACT_SUFX, USE_{BZIP2,ZIP}
are not any more likely to conflict with autoextract than the default
.tar.gz archives. The use of EXTRACT_CMD, EXTRACT_BEFORE_ARGS,
EXTRACT_AFTER_ARGS would need to disable autoextract, though.
Converting existing usage to autoextract is straightforward, it's
just a bit of work.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b4d0cm$13n8$1>