Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 16:17:56 +0100 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r248097 - in head: . lib/libncp lib/libprocstat share/examples/nwclient sys/fs/nwfs sys/modules/ncp sys/modules/nwfs sys/netncp usr.bin/ncplist usr.bin/ncplogin usr.sbin/mount_nwfs Message-ID: <CAJ-FndA25G9PccZwyPP2K=yXsryGVF3bzZcuap_B8nDfAgK8Jw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303091501010.51997@fledge.watson.org> References: <201303091245.r29Cjbr3054004@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303091501010.51997@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi Attilio: > > It's really great to see the continued progress towards the goal > entirely-MPSAFE VFS in 10.x -- we owe you a huge vote of thanks for pursuing > this! Thanks for the kind words. The VFS can be considered completely MPSAFE by date, the only remaining thing to do is sweeping out smbfs/netsmb. However a known FreeBSD shops has patches to make smbfs MPSAFE and I'd rather give them more time to commit them and re-add smbfs as a MPSAFE filesystem rather than get into their way and remove the support. This is the last bit to sort out. Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-FndA25G9PccZwyPP2K=yXsryGVF3bzZcuap_B8nDfAgK8Jw>