Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 02:03:49 +0200 From: Martin <nakal@web.de> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Second "RFC" on pkg-data idea for ports Message-ID: <1081901028.772.72.camel@klotz.local> In-Reply-To: <p06020421bca222e97833@[128.113.24.47]> References: <p0602040cbca10a7dbe52@[128.113.24.47]> <20040413121925.GB29867@voodoo.oberon.net> <p0602041abca1e49dde40@[128.113.24.47]> <407C4035.8020609@ciam.ru> <p0602041fbca1ff481e60@[128.113.24.47]> <1081896823.772.58.camel@klotz.local> <p06020421bca222e97833@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Wed, den 14.04.2004 schrieb Garance A Drosihn um 1:22: > If it is easy for you to execute commands, then something > like: > > /bin/make -f /usr/ports/shells/bash2/Makefile -V PORTVERSION Try to imagine, I have to call this command a few hundred times while unfolding a category node in my tree view. :) > Would it be useful-enough if the pd-handling program > could spit out a true XML-formatted document, once we knew > what that was? I realize this is rather lame, but it would > allow us to keep this key program pretty small and simple. I think, XML is good for writing out things. You can simply use fprintfs to spit out the data. It is normal to do that. It would be a good idea to have a good DTD or a XML-schema to parse it later. Having this few things in mind, you can just start with a XML-prologue, then the DOCTYPE and then whatever you want (as long as it's well-formed and valid XML). > Well, at the moment I am *not* using XML... :-) Sorry for my English :) Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1081901028.772.72.camel>