Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Feb 1997 22:20:49 -0800
From:      Craig Shaver <craig@ProGroup.com>
To:        Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc:        scsi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ASUS SC-200 vs SC-875
Message-ID:  <330A9BC1.59E2B600@ProGroup.com>
References:  <3.0.1.32.19970218121828.00a42af0@sentex.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> 
> Hello,
>         In our news machine we currently have 6 drives and one 2940 controller...
> I was thinking of adding another PCI scsi controller to speed it up a bit
> and allow us to add more drives....  Since I already have a controller I
> can boot from, would this matter with that card ?  Or should I pay a little
> extra for the Ultra version ? We dont have any ultra drives just yet...
> Would it matter for now?  Also, how are the drivers for the NCR based SCSI
> controllers ? Are they as stable as the Adaptec ones ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         ---Mike

I have only run NCR controllers on my FreeBSD computer.  I like them. 
And most of the people say the 810 NCR fast scsi-II controllers (ASUS
SC-200) are almost equal to the performance of the 2940.  The fast and
wide NCR 825 based controllers are supported in all version of FreeBSD,
and the Ultra Wide NCR 875 controllers are supported in version 2.2 and
later.  By all means use the ASUS 200 for a second controller.  I
recommend it.  :)



-- 
Craig Shaver  (craig@progroup.com) (415)390-0654 
Productivity Group POB 60458 Sunnyvale, CA  94088



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?330A9BC1.59E2B600>