Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:41:43 +0100 From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: Johan Hendriks <Johan@double-l.nl>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.2 dies in zfs Message-ID: <75706651-E9D4-4C40-B39C-6B8B0023DFF7@sarenet.es> In-Reply-To: <m2ws1jh2oy.wl%randy@psg.com> References: <m2skcajavv.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2r5ruja6v.wl%randy@psg.com> <4B066B13.1070006@freebsd.org> <m2bpiwitz7.wl%randy@psg.com> <4b07ac59.A2Afaf4X0IZlrgGU%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCBA5722E@w2003s01.double-l.local> <m2ws1jh2oy.wl%randy@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >=20 >> Try running FreeBSD 7-Stable to get the latest ZFS version which on >> FreeBSD is 13 >=20 > that is what i am running. RELENG_7 I've been following ZFS on FreeBSD long ago, and it really seems to be = stable on 8.0/amd64. Even Sun Microsystems say that ZFS is better used on a 64 bit system, = they don't recommend it on the 32 bit version of Solaris. That said, there's still an outstanding bug, I managed to deadlock it = but the condition is easy to avoid. Borja.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?75706651-E9D4-4C40-B39C-6B8B0023DFF7>