Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 22:47:07 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: joelh@gnu.org Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, tlambert@primenet.com, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Heads up on LFS Message-ID: <199808070447.WAA16202@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199808062321.SAA01224@detlev.UUCP> References: <19980806112955.A4299@reilly.home> <199808060606.XAA22855@usr09.primenet.com> <199808061438.IAA12182@mt.sri.com> <199808062321.SAA01224@detlev.UUCP>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ moved to -chat ] > > I know, I've tried and have benchmarks to prove it. Using 100% of > > the CPU for minutes at a time, I still get the GC kicking in using > > Sun's JVM implementation. (The M$ implementation is notorious for > > doing bad things since it uses a different reaping technology, so > > it's much less useful for programs that make heavy use of 'new'.) > > Is there some sort of irony in M$ not working well with memory-hungry > programs? It's not necessarily memory-hungry programs, but highly dynamic programs. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808070447.WAA16202>