Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:54:09 +0000 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 132879 for review Message-ID: <863at7upla.wl%rpaulo@fnop.net> In-Reply-To: <200801091252.m09CqFkf018427@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200801091252.m09CqFkf018427@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:52:15 GMT, Rui Paulo wrote: > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=132879 > > Change 132879 by rpaulo@rpaulo_alpha on 2008/01/09 12:51:55 > > draft-ietf-tcpm-ecnsyn-04 is out and it discusses a drawback > of setting ECT in the SYN/ACK packet. > It's not problematic, but let's be like everyone else (except > for NetBSD) by not setting ECT in the SYN/ACK packet. > > We may revert back to the old behaviour in the future. And also: if we revert to the old behaviour, there should probably be a sysctl to control it. -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?863at7upla.wl%rpaulo>