Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:07:58 +0100 From: Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Using DNAT and DNS round-robin Message-ID: <112451517177.20011209190758@buz.ch> In-Reply-To: <PGECILGGNJGDPJKLFEMIMEJGCIAA.dpuryear@usa.net> References: <PGECILGGNJGDPJKLFEMIMEJGCIAA.dpuryear@usa.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello Dustin, Sunday, December 09, 2001, 6:59:21 PM, you wrote: > I forgot to mention our third option, which also appears quite > viable. We are looking into the use of Squid, which has virtual > hosting support. Using this method we can forgo DNAT entirely. Any > thoughts or experience with this additional method? I don't fully get what you're trying to achieve. If each machine got an IP on the firewall, why would you want to use NAT, then (no routing beyond the firewall is about the only reason I can think of and in that case, you should kick your ISP)? Round robin DNS for sure does work and it doesn't at all care whether you got some NAT redirects or not. Best regards, Gabriel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5i iQEVAwUBPBOaXsZa2WpymlDxAQFzaQf/Xl3hzdn0Ufy6ePJo5bFLz5uUR31AX2ll SX0/07cnHlf3oMRZTdONy/0gRN7BKMSx0BFtrEtteAC9v2cdExSs34NLlzN/nJIx hbdSQteZX/r0cA8lTU3doBR08sCSHWSCyFvbHPhisv9LWSLgGykrtoERdloiODkc Mq8AL2/Fo67LxaqTEORIG8rGioZ0yUDBs9MYyfY2OHmeV5iJNO/q+xa++ENHn41f 4QOcgN8ft/LukBByiPYFGiV9EY3lv+JZ7ma8Yz6pIKOJbJf2TnMo1UUp3In4cpBp v5GMgW1z5XL5jWbaxWintuir0MUu+k7tnbXQasEXSK9DYeIRUM7n6g== =UXQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?112451517177.20011209190758>