Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Oct 2001 01:28:56 -0800 (PST)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: time_t not to change size on x86
Message-ID:  <XFMail.011029012856.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200110290244.f9T2ihc04347@mass.dis.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 29-Oct-01 Mike Smith wrote:
>> Changing alpha isn't near as "bad" as changing i386, as it already passes
>> arg
>> s
>> in 64-bit registers, so printf won't break, etc.  I don't think i386 should
>> ever change, personally, but I don't think it will really break Alpha near
>> as
>> much as i386.
> 
> As with most folk, you forget pass-by-reference here.  8)

It still may not be as fatal.  If alpha aligns structures on 8 byte boundaries
to avoid alignment problems, then you will actually have 8 bytes regardless. 
Depends on how strict the alignment is, though.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.011029012856.jhb>