Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:16:30 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, Steve Price <steve@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ksh93
Message-ID:  <20010228091630.B92203@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A9CF86E.18C36ED0@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 03:09:02PM %2B0200
References:  <200102260514.f1Q5EHJ96328@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010226215311.A44937@spawn.nectar.com> <20010227154226.A36915@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <20010227162104.A7892@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010228065758.A29047@hamlet.nectar.com> <3A9CF86E.18C36ED0@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Idea: why not to create dynamic executable, but explicitly link static
> versions of required libs (cc -o foo foo.o bar.o /usr/lib/libc.a ...)
> into it? The resulting executable will be protected against breakage of
> system libs, while still able to use dl*() functions.

Which shell uses dl*()??  Why is this needed, and why complicate things.

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010228091630.B92203>