Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:27:18 -0400
From:      Terry Zink <tzink@metrocon.com>
To:        Jason Nugent <malhavoc@stomped.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: More on the NFS issue
Message-ID:  <01070310271807.22407@coldstone.metrocon.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0107030818210.48833-100000@smithers.stomped.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.33.0107030818210.48833-100000@smithers.stomped.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
type kldstat	
Basically, the rc.conf loads a kernel module I believe.
Thats all that firewall_enable entry does to my KNOWLEDGE. (ive never checked 
it though).



On Tuesday 03 July 2001 09:31, you wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
> Yeap, I'm still fiddling with this.  I've discovered even more interesting
> things.
>
> If you recall, I was having difficulty getting my NFS partitions to mount
> correctly after upgrading to the latest 4.3-STABLE.  My latest experiment
> was to see if IPFW was causing problems, so I performed the following
> steps:
>
> 1.  I re-cvsup'ped the latest 4.3-stable source, and created a new kernel
> config file called TEST that was essentially a direct copy of GENERIC.
> The only thing I changed was the IDENT and the MAXUSERS.
>
> 2.  I did a new make buildworld and make buildkernel using my test kernel.
> I then performed a make installkernel with this new kernel.  I did -not-
> perform a make installworld.
>
> 3.  I rebooted the machine from my terminal server and watched, with a
> certain amount of glee, as it booted up with no errors.  I shelled in, and
> made sure all my partitions were mounted.  I was happy.
>
> 4.  I found something quite interesting at that point.  You see, I had
> left my old firewall rules in /etc/rc.firewall. I had also left my
> firewall_enable="yes" and firewall_type="client" config options in
> /etc/rc.conf.  What surprised me, therefore, was that all my rules were
> loaded and active, and working (I tested my rules from various other
> machines, and used ipfw to add and remove them).
>
> But, I thought I had removed all IPFW support from my test kernel? It was
> a copy of GENERIC?
>
> So, my  question is, why would my rules still be working? I realize
> that I had left things turned on in my config file, but I was expecting
> those options to cause errors since IPFW was turned off in my test kernel.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jason
>
> ----------------------
> Jason Nugent
> Aka MalHavoc
> Server Programmer and Administrator
>
> S  T  O  M  P  E  D  .  C  O  M
>
> For PGP public key:  http://malhavoc.stomped.com
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

-- 
Regards,

Terry Zink
System Administrator
Metrocon Communications
Phone: (212) 661-6800 x 1553

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01070310271807.22407>