Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Nov 1999 21:00:42 -0700 (MST)
From:      "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>
To:        shimon@simon-shapiro.org (Simon Shapiro)
Cc:        rjesup@wgate.com (Randell Jesup), freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: I/O Evaluation Questions (Long but interesting!)
Message-ID:  <199911120400.VAA31700@panzer.kdm.org>
In-Reply-To: <382B8C18.DD84F967@simon-shapiro.org> from Simon Shapiro at "Nov 11, 1999 10:40:08 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Simon Shapiro wrote...
> "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> > 
> > [ Simon:  the "charset = " (i.e. nothing) line your mail makes my mailer
> > barf.  You may want to adjust your character set. ]
>   [  Am using Netscape Messenger.  Know not how to do that
>      (no relevant preference found :-( ]

My best guess is, go to:

Edit -> Preferences -> Navigator -> Languages

And make sure you at least have English defined there.  Also, go to:

View -> Character Set

And make sure you've got Western (ISO-8559-1) defined.

> > Simon Shapiro wrote...
> > > Randell Jesup wrote:
> > > > Unlikely, though, and very tricky.  (Interesting idea, though -
> > > > pseudo-mmap.)  They also could set up the DMA, and mark the pages in the
> > > > page table so that you'll fault if you try to access them, and then undo
> > > > the mark when the IO is done (or as each N pages of the IO is done make
> > > > those N pages accessible).  There are many cute tricks here...
> > > >
> > > >         What hardware do you have that gives 100MB/s or more???
> > >
> > > (bragging corner: 167 read, 138 write :-)  DPT PM3755U2B with
> > > 256MB of ECC cache in a Dell PowerEdge 1300/600.
> > > FreeBSD RELENG_3, single CPU running.
> > 
> > How can you get speeds like that with just a 32-bit PCI bus?  The specs for
> > the PowerEdge 1300 say it has 5 32-bit PCI slots:
> 
> These numbers are for block devices.  The kernel obviously
> caches some of this.  I should look next time at emory usage;
> The machine has 1GB of memory. The dataset is about 15GB per
> array.

Is that for random or sequential I/O?  With sequential I/O, you would
probably blow away any caching effects.  With random I/O, though, you might
get significant help from the cache, especially with that much RAM.

> I am getting about 120MB/Sec form the PCI
> bus.

I can believe that.

> Raw disks perfromance is totally throttled by physics;
> We are running at about 200% of Seagate specs.

How can you run at 200% of the spec?  Most of the time disk manufacturers
are even a little optimistic about their high end performance.

> I am running into some strange situations.  Perhaps some 
> light can be shed;

Sorry, no clue there.

Ken
-- 
Kenneth Merry
ken@kdm.org




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911120400.VAA31700>