Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:01:43 +0100 From: "Vinson U. Anthony" <ttdrl@earthlink.net> To: <ppc@freebsd.org> Subject: oh Message-ID: <001301c83fca$a943ddc0$a7972cce@uon>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C83FD3.0B022B40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DJ, Alex and I are here, but most of the halls are deserted. Programs = for all other dates will be announced. Some more sophisticated tools allow productions in the grammar to be = attributed with weights. In that case you would need to create a static = method on the DataSpan class and invoke it from the extension method. = Micrsoft missed the oppurtunity to make it just work. Or perhaps that only shows that unit testing isnt a big thing in = seattle. Sufficiently Large Projects A similar situation arises in = projects that are sufficiently large. Most interesting programs have an infinite number of possible input = sequences because of their recursive nature and so the set of tests must = be sampled from an infinite input space. This includes all sorts of things like lost sales through negative = customer perception, cost of software patches, legal action, etc. Notice that since each learner has a hypothesis space, a given concept = may have not be in that space. , sponsor of the Humanist Society of = Metropolitan New York Web site, is pleased to host a streaming audio = archive of older Equal Time for Freethought radio shows on our Archive = page. TDD is a learning process. A more practical measure for estimating the = relative cost of a bug might be the probability that users will find it = multiplied by the severity of the bug. Where the training experience E = is the automated tests, the task T is improving the quality of the = program, and the performance measure P is the percentage of tests = passed. To put it in Haskell terms, I don't think that testing monads is = nearly as useful as testing functions, and too much effort put into the = testing of monads is a waste of time. I was dusty and physically exhausted from hours of playing paintball. Testing creates tests by drawing input sequences out of the input = sequence space. It is easy to imagine that tests could be generated = randomly by selecting random input sequences. This hypothesis is then = evaluated and the new experiences are added to the training data. Attached is the modified code. When in my design process I spend the time to aggressively looking for = these kinds of objects, the resulting design ends up cleaner. are we developer should force consumer to move ? Refactor code = Repeat When I say refactor, I mean it in the strictest sense. I believe that unit testing is essential, but that functional testing = often devolves into an exercise in unbiased learning. While this is an = accurate measure of cost, it is not very practical because it is very = hard to estimate. are we developer should force consumer to move ? ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C83FD3.0B022B40--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001301c83fca$a943ddc0$a7972cce>