Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:50:18 -0400
From:      Jim Trigg <jtrigg@spamcop.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: flash
Message-ID:  <20041026145018.GB82343@spamcop.net>
In-Reply-To: <20041026104948.GH6513@alzatex.com>
References:  <ef60af0904102423021787c31b@mail.gmail.com> <0800C9A6-264C-11D9-BB05-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> <ef60af0904102423184c444813@mail.gmail.com> <26FD3DFA-264E-11D9-BB05-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> <ef60af090410251253297c4f92@mail.gmail.com> <20041025175035.K11535@frambozen.monochrome.org> <ef60af0904102514574f74ea2e@mail.gmail.com> <ef60af0904102523183d890850@mail.gmail.com> <ef60af0904102523193f1037a0@mail.gmail.com> <20041026104948.GH6513@alzatex.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:49:48AM -0700, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:19:53AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > goddammit :)
> > 
> > 7rxI# make install
> > ===>  flashpluginwrapper-0.20021113 is only for i386, and you are
> > running amd64.
> 
> Isn't amd64 supposed to be fully compatible with i386?  Maybe the port
> just doesn't reconize that fact.  The only other thing might be if
> firefox is compiled as amd64, u might need to recompile it as i386 but
> don't take my word for it.

Yes and no.  A single program (for example, mozilla plus plugins) must
be entirely either native AMD64 or ix86, not mixed.  So you'd need a
mozilla (and any needed shared libraries) built for ix86.

Jim
-- 
Jim Trigg, Lord High Everything Else  O-          /"\
                                                  \ /  ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
Hostmaster, Huie Kin family website                X    HELP CURE HTML MAIL
Verger, All Saints Church - Sharon Chapel         / \



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041026145018.GB82343>