Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:57:31 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@critical.ch>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <4BEB94CB.9080100@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100512162639.GB29259@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <201005101825.o4AIPXGC040135@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100510221146.c70877af.ehaupt@critical.ch> <4BE8AF14.3080006@FreeBSD.org> <20100511094731.7f461540.ehaupt@critical.ch> <4BE9A251.6040602@FreeBSD.org> <20100512162639.GB29259@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/12/10 09:26, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:30:41AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 05/11/10 00:47, Emanuel Haupt wrote: >>> >>> Doug, the OPTIONS patch as you posted it on ports@ does not play so >>> well with shells/bash-static. I've created shells/bash-static in order >>> to have packages created by the build cluster. >> >> Yeah, I forgot about that port, sorry. I can rework the patch easily >> enough if there is interest. > > An OPTIONS patch would be find - as long as it isn't the default. David, I do have a vague recollection that you had concerns about OPTIONS in the past, but don't recall the details. There have been a number of improvements in the OPTIONS framework in the past 2-3 years, can you share your concerns again and perhaps some (or even a majority) of them have actually been addressed? Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BEB94CB.9080100>