Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:31:25 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> To: Terry Ewing <terry@dcomm.net> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IP masqurading Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.981112163041.968A-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <4.1.19981112121648.00a813c0@mail1.dcomm.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Terry Ewing wrote: > People here are thinking of putting our co-located computers behind a > FreeBSD IPFW firewall. At the same time they were thinking of giving the > co-located servers 192.168.x.x IP's so they can be removed if we go through > renumbering. We'd just masquerade the real IP to the 192.168 IP in the > firewall. > > Can anyone arm me with a good reason why we shouldn't do this? Because giving (paying) colocated server internal IPs is degrading the QoS. Some UDP and other programs don't work with it. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.HPP.3.96.981112163041.968A-100000>