Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Jan 2000 18:31:30 +0100
From:      Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>
To:        Mohit Aron <aron@cs.rice.edu>
Cc:        weyrich@goodnet.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: performance of FreeBSD-current as SMP
Message-ID:  <20000108183130.A13891@cichlids.cichlids.com>
In-Reply-To: <200001081602.KAA11960@cs.rice.edu>; from aron@cs.rice.edu on Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 10:02:25AM -0600
References:  <20000108134110.B442@cichlids.cichlids.com> <200001081602.KAA11960@cs.rice.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Mohit Aron (aron@cs.rice.edu):

> Good Lord! This is the second time now. I even SAID in my last two mails that
> there is only ONE processor. Theortically then, FreeBSD configured with/without
> SMP support shouldn't make any difference.

Yes, I know. I just wanted to mention it.
Well, it's known that SMP produces this overhead.

The same is for NT and Linux, if you enable SMP and use only 1
prozessor.

It's the protocol-overhead or other overhead or such (don't know the
internals)

Alex

-- 
I doubt, therefore I might be. 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000108183130.A13891>